Home | TV Spot | Open Letter | Proposition 911 | Contact | Vote/E-Lists | ResponseProposition 911
An initiative to factually establish, and effectively compell official public response to the confluence of the following justifications that U.S. citizens could rightfully claim as reason to pressure the press to press the president to present the "9/11 Truth" (i.e. Facts relating to the under-examined topic of Bush's 9/11 failures and fortunes.):
REASON - The case for probable cause to compell the 9/11 Truth from Bush.
RIGHT - The constitutionally-guaranteed citizen Right to the Truth in Government.
RESPONSIBILITY - The duty to verify that the U.S. has NOT been comandeered in a covert coup d'etat by a powerful and profoundly corrupt Bush family network.Whereas, since 9/11 was the best thing that could have happened for the Bush administration, it is dangerously illogical and ill advised to leave unresolved, the issue as to whether the situation is coincidence or conspiracy. The de facto operating assumption of most Americans is that 9/11 was just a convenient coincidence for Bush. Closer examination of the issue reveals probable cause to conclude otherwise. The following facts and analysis reasonably constitute a compelling case to be made for demanding that this issue be embraced and advanced as legitimate news.
THE CASE - Team Bush possessed the means, method and motive to enable 9/11 Fulsome perspective on Bush begins with his family history in business and government involving defense, intelligence, energy, Saudi rulers and deceptive practices as described by Kevin Phillips, in his book, American Dynasty - Aristrocracy, Fortune and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush. It paints a portrait of a family which could possess the means, method and motive to allow the attackers’ success, knowing it would justify pre-existing plans for war profiteering.
EXHIBIT A - Agenda: Proof of Premeditation of Profit Motives
The Project for a New American Century(PNAC) is a think tank founded by Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and other Bush Administration officials. Precisely one year prior to 9/11, on page 51 of a policy paper titled Rebuilding America's Defenses, PNAC accurately predicted that advance of their agenda would only accelerate after a "catalyzing and cataclysmic event...like a new Pearl Harbor.EXHIBIT 'B' - Behavior: Gross negligence of duties as Commander-in-Chief
The video clip made famous by Michael Moore, shows Commander-in-Chief Bush inaction in the class room. He was the only human who could have authorized use of military force against domestic commercial aircraft. Interestingly, the command chain for those orders had been re-routed April 2001, to go through Donald Rumsfeld, who was also apparently oblivious to the meaning of black smoke streaming from the twin towers. Bush failure to perform on 9/11 and ever since, in his duty to seek answers and accountability for the many mysterious breakdowns, is simply suspect.EXHIBIT 'C' - Cover-up: The pattern of secrecy is a clear and present danger
Not only did Bush not try to find and fix the flaws and failures that enabled 9/11, but the administration actively undermined investigation, stone-walled and covered-up. The Bush White House whitewashed the 9/11 Commission and discouraged investigation at every step that it could. The administration also over-classified the 9/11 Congressional inquiry report, redacting 28 pages about 9/11 plot support by Bush associates in Saudi government, as detailed in a book by Senator Bob Graham.
RESOLVED,
That, the People of the United States who challenge the official story of 9/11, hereafter referred to as Team Truth, having just cause for concern about the state of the Union, hereby declare as justified, this exercise of the 1st Amendment Right to petition the government for a redress of grievances with George W. Bush and his administration, regarding his refusal to discuss or disclose facts relevent to the events of September 11, 2001.That, Team Truth, in order to justify this exercise of political will, based upon substantiation put forth herein, do ordain and establish our legitimate possession of the reason, the right and the responsibility to challenge the official "9/11 Story".
That, The foregoing course of action is necessitated and justified by the steadily-emerging potential for a scenario of significant consequence to the national interest. The probability for this crisis situation increases with every day that the Bush administration refuses to disclose details about 9/11, which can reasonably be construed as indicating the incrimating nature of the details. It is imperitive that the citizen public know the whole Truth about the events of September 11, 2001, with regard to their relationship to the foreknowledge, failures and fortunes of the Bush administration. Since citizen access to Truth in Government is contingent upon the will of the press to fulfill its function as the "fourth estate", then mainstream media must be called into account as to their respective reactions to this proposition.
THE REASON
That, The 9/11 Commission Report concluded that U.S. ‘National Security’ failures were a major factor that enabled 19 perpetrators to achieve such stunning success on 9/11. The panel also points out that there has not been a single disciplinary action in connection with any of these extraordinary breakdowns of national defense and law enforcement. It is reasonable to conclude that, since accountability is a top-down-the-ranks management dynamic, then in lieu of any 9/11-related discipline, responsibility should ascend the command chain, ultimately arriving at the desk of the Commander-in-Chief, U.S. President, George W. Bush (GWB).That, This perspective that GWB is responsible for 9/11, plus the widely acknowledged fact that he is exploiting 9/11, makes clear that it’s not only fair, but also necessary to conduct a performance evaluation with a fulsome perspective on 9/11’s significance to the nation. Such analysis should give appropriate consideration to the idea that GWB holds a solemn 9/11 ‘responsibility', inseparable from and of a comparable degree to the ‘authority’ that he derived from 9/11. It is fair to conclude that responsible White House response to such easy infiltration of the continental United States by political adversaries willing to die to make their lethal point, must necessitate identification and correction of three major factors in 9/11:
- National security failures that enabled the attackers to succeed.
- Foreign policy failures that motivated the attackers to succeed.
- Secrecy policy failures that prevented detection, allowing the attackers to succeed.
The Commander-In-Chief, who presided over 9/11, should have led the quest to find and fix these flaws and failures at home and minimize provocative policy abroad. However, that scenario could hardly be much further from the truth. Even Bush-appointed 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean acknowledged such Bush administration resistance to investigation that the “9/11 Families” had to overcome. Remarking about the four 9/11 Widows known as ‘The Jersey Girls,’ he affirmed, “I doubt very much we would be in existence without them.” [NYT .04.04.01]
That, speculation as to why the White House would impede investigation could well begin with logic offered by GWB himself; that topic-avoidance implies guilt. On April 29, 2004, GWB and Dick Cheney were ‘interviewed’ by the 9/11 Panel at the White House, in a session criticized by the New York Times for its excessive secrecy. After the interview, while talking to reporters in the Rose Garden, GWB had the perfect opportunity to put an end to suggestions that their secrecy was suspect, but all he said on the matter was, “If we had something to hide, we wouldn't have met with them in the first place!” GWB and Cheney had only agreed to the meeting under political pressure after credible accounts by former White House officials that GWB ignored terrorist threats before 9/11. Since it was well known that they had actually avoided the panel for months, the fact that Bush ‘spin doctors’ couldn’t think of anything better is revealing; as is GWB’s refusal to answer to the very next question posed to him in the Rose Garden, “Don’t you think the 9/11 Families deserve to have a transcript or be able to see what you said?” Since GWB was willing to risk the political ramifications of such blatant disrespect to the 9/11 Families, it is reasonable to conclude that whatever the ‘9/11 Truth’ is, it is likely to be quite incriminating.
THE RIGHT
That, the fundamental philosophical foundation of the United States, articulated in documents such as The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution, is predicated upon essential ideas such as self-evident Truths and Unalienable Rights. For example, the first amendment guarantees the right to an unrestricted Press and citizen freedom to petition the government to redress grievances.That, based on the founders passion for the liberty of truth over the tyranny of deceit and appreciation for the dynamics of democracy, one could reasonably conclude that "Truth", per se, belongs among these Rights which define a democratic repuplic. Since democracy depends on citizen access to Truth - all facts relevant to the discharge of duties in public office - it must not be denied by any form of tyranny. Therefore, it is fair to conclude that implicit in the basic citizen Rights, which were left open-ended to be amended, is the Right to Truth about the state of the nation.
That, It was only about a century after Roger Williams was bannished by the Puritans in Massachusetts for ideas about "Liberty of Conscience" and seperation of church and state, that the United States was founded upon those very same principles. So, it is likely the founders steered clear of the delicate issue of defining "Truth", in order to achieve consensus and proceed. But they likely visualized that there would come a time when the democracy would need to define "Truth" in a governmental sense, so that it could be guaranteed as a Right. The time has come that we, the People can and must recalibrate Truth in a way that can be guaranteed.
THE RESPONSIBILITY
That, Truth is not only a citizen right, but a responsibility that comes with democracy's citizen-sovereignty over government. As the ultimate authority in a democracy, citizens have a responsibility for the actions of their elected officials. Upon bestowing the authority imbued in public office, all citizens in turn, accept a share of the responsibility to ensure that the authority is not being compromised by corruptive influence in between elections.That, as a rule, if suspicion is reasonably suggested by bigger picture perspective about patterns of behavior, including a constellation of circumstances that reasonably resemble those commonly observed with criminal complicity, then the matter must be addressed. Due diligence should be practiced in pursuit of either proving suspicions false or impeaching, investigating, indicting, prosecuting and sentencing criminals.
That, citizen ability to fulfill the responsibility to exercise this right to the Truth is dependent upon professional journalism, also known as the "press". To fulfill its function as "the fourth estate", the role of the press includes its own responsibility; to gather and report "Truth" about matters of government, including all relevant information pertaining to the honorable discharge of duties in public office.
THE REDRESS
That, whether or not it applies to 9/11, it may prove prudent to compell the Congress to promptly draft, adopt, enact and invoke a "Truth in Government" Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This measure must provide for a mechanism of mandamus as a means to address apparent abuses of powers. The act should create legislative authority that would, upon establishment of probable cause, enable Congress to overcome claims of Executive Privilege and compell full disclosure of details being withheld by the President and the Cabinet pertaining to performance in the discharge of duties, as an legal instrument to be formally known as "Executive Challenge".
THE CONCLUSION
Therefore, this proposition and supporting documents serve to establish reasonable probability that Team Bush is hiding a 9/11 Truth to which the American people have a Right. These arguments constitute the basic case establishing ‘probable cause’, which justifies demands that Team Bush consent to promptly provide full, sworn and public disclosure of the ‘9/11 Truth, the whole 9/11 Truth and nothing but the 9/11 Truth.’ Bush failure to do so can reasonably be contrued as further proof of cover-up, which is a fairly accurate indicator of criminal activity. The prospects for it increase when combined with the other questionable Team Bush behavior patterns.Given the validity of this contention and the gravity of the scenario presented herein, it is justifiable to expect the press and other relevant agencies to respond. Those that officially maintain that the proposition possesses a truth-value of ‘false’ should post credible documented evidence supporting that position for public perusal on its web site. Until the veracity of its basic premise is successfully challenged with evidence that conclusively contradicts the contentions, Proposition 911 should be accepted as accurate and actively advanced in news reporting activities.
Home | Open Letter | Proposition 911 | Contact | Vote/E-Lists | Response